Alteredbhoy

Should probably be in the Joke thread, but ...

123 posts in this topic

13 hours ago, rowlf said:

Wait a minute, bro! I'm not calling her a streetwalker. I'm just saying she seems to be the type that would 'strut her stuff'..............with all due respect!:58674be6ca98e_EmojiSmiley-15:

If I were walking the streets Rowlfie you would be the pavement beneath my feet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, helen said:

Watch out all Norwegians! It sounds like D. Trump wants you for his shithole country.

Rightly the Norwegians responded by saying they didn't want to go live in Trump toilet.  Quoting "Of course people from Norway would love to move to a country where people are far more likely to be shot, live in poverty, get no healthcare because they’re poor, get no paid parental leave or subsidized daycare and see fewer women in political power”....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, luckyme said:

Wait a minute. Hasn't Norway got the highest suicide rate in the world?

No. Not even close.

Edited by Alteredbhoy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, luckyme said:

Wait a minute. Hasn't Norway got the highest suicide rate in the world?

Can I amend that? I think it should be Sweden.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, luckyme said:

Can I amend that? I think it should be Sweden.

What the hell diff does it make? They're all a bunch of white Socialists.............................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Alteredbhoy said:

No. Not even close.

 

4 minutes ago, luckyme said:

Can I amend that? I think it should be Sweden.

How about Bumfukt, Egypt?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, luckyme said:

Can I amend that? I think it should be Sweden.

According to the World Health Organisation, Sweden's suicide rate is higher than Norway's, but at 46th highest amongst sovereign nations it's a long way from the highest in the world.  In fact Sweden only has the 8th highest rate in the EU.  Norway's rate is lower than the world average.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, rowlf said:

What the hell diff does it make? They're all a bunch of white Socialists.............................

If that's the case, why does DT want more of them in the US?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that information. It's always nice to come across an intelligent person.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, macboatface said:

Thank you for that information. It's always nice to come across an intelligent person.

Boatie, you mistake intelligence for not just making statements with no thought about whether they are factually correct or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Alteredbhoy said:

If that's the case, why does DT want more of them in the US?

Let me 'splain it to you. You live in this country. Due to the various social issues and to have a more well rounded population, we need immigrants. Hmm....where should we look for these people? Nah, we don't need no fooking Asians or Indians. Doctors are a dime a dozen in our respective countries. Right? I know! Let's look in the deepest darkest part of Africa and/or the Caribbean, where 3 out of 4 immigrants are in the welfare line and are placed directly on the shoulders of the working man.

It makes sense to me!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Alteredbhoy said:

Boatie, you mistake intelligence for not just making statements with no thought about whether they are factually correct or not.

But wouldn't it be a very dull forum if'fn we referred to wiki prior to engaging in dialogue!:58674be5313cc_EmojiSmiley-12:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, rowlf said:

But wouldn't it be a very dull forum if'fn we referred to wiki prior to engaging in dialogue!:58674be5313cc_EmojiSmiley-12:

The opposite rowlf.  If everyone fact checked what they posted it before opening their cyber mouths, then we could debate opinions.  But the debate about immigration and racism has been side tracked because someone who didn't know what they were talking about wildly claimed that Norway had the world's highest suicide rate.  This is the problem with the "post truth" world in which some of our leading politicians want us to live.  

When DT questions wether his predecessor as POTUS was born in the US, or claims that Muslims in New York celebrated the 9/11 attacks, or retweets the fake videos of British racist parties, then someone not caring about whether Norway or Sweden has the world's highest suicide rate before claiming that both have is not good for nurturing debate.

When

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Alteredbhoy said:

The opposite rowlf.  If everyone fact checked what they posted it before opening their cyber mouths, then we could debate opinions.  But the debate about immigration and racism has been side tracked because someone who didn't know what they were talking about wildly claimed that Norway had the world's highest suicide rate.  This is the problem with the "post truth" world in which some of our leading politicians want us to live.  

When DT questions wether his predecessor as POTUS was born in the US, or claims that Muslims in New York celebrated the 9/11 attacks, or retweets the fake videos of British racist parties, then someone not caring about whether Norway or Sweden has the world's highest suicide rate before claiming that both have is not good for nurturing debate.

When

I believe another member has told you to learn to read properly.

Nobody has claimed Norway, or for that matter, Sweden, has the highest rate of suicides. I believe the poster asked a question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Alteredbhoy said:

The opposite rowlf.  If everyone fact checked what they posted it before opening their cyber mouths, then we could debate opinions.  But the debate about immigration and racism has been side tracked because someone who didn't know what they were talking about wildly claimed that Norway had the world's highest suicide rate.  This is the problem with the "post truth" world in which some of our leading politicians want us to live.  

When DT questions wether his predecessor as POTUS was born in the US, or claims that Muslims in New York celebrated the 9/11 attacks, or retweets the fake videos of British racist parties, then someone not caring about whether Norway or Sweden has the world's highest suicide rate before claiming that both have is not good for nurturing debate.

When

You know, the pissy little fact about all this, is that it really doesn't matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, macboatface said:

I believe another member has told you to learn to read properly.

Nobody has claimed Norway, or for that matter, Sweden, has the highest rate of suicides. I believe the poster asked a question.

Now that is skating of the highest order.

On 13/01/2018 at 9:21 AM, luckyme said:

Wait a minute. Hasn't Norway got the highest suicide rate in the world?

That is a rhetorical question.  It is a statement masquerading as a question.

On 13/01/2018 at 2:31 PM, luckyme said:

Can I amend that? I think it should be Sweden.

And this isn't a question at all.  You posted that you think Sweden has the highest rate.  And you were wrong as normal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, rowlf said:

You know, the pissy little fact about all this, is that it really doesn't matter.

That's the problem with you and DT.  The truth doesn't matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Alteredbhoy said:

Now that is skating of the highest order.

That is a rhetorical question.  It is a statement masquerading as a question.

And this isn't a question at all.  You posted that you think Sweden has the highest rate.  And you were wrong as normal.

I had lessons in all those subjects, including pig breeding, from yourself and you gave me the highest marks possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, weeniewinderupper said:

I had lessons in all those subjects, including pig breeding, from yourself and you gave me the highest marks possible.

I've never given anyone lessons in pig breeding - so what you have posted is a straight lie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Alteredbhoy said:

That's the problem with you and DT.  The truth doesn't matter.

What matters is his actions. You live in a world of words. Why don't you just try to say something that he did right? Is it in you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Alteredbhoy said:

I've never given anyone lessons in pig breeding - so what you have posted is a straight lie.

Your world I'm afraid, is one big lie. You wake on a morning telling yourself how great you are and the lie continues through your day until you go to bed still uttering the lie you woke with. Get back to Wales and try to improve your success with pigs as you haven't had much on here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, rowlf said:

What matters is his actions. You live in a world of words. Why don't you just try to say something that he did right? Is it in you?

Well, as an admission that the truth doesn't matter, this is not bad, but as for his actions which of these was he right to do ...

"Grabbing women by the pussy"?

Mocking a disabled journalist?

Pulling out of the Paris Agreement?

Retweeting the the fake posts of Britain First?

Claiming Obama was not American?

Stating that Muslim Americans celebrated 9/11?

Referring to Africa and the Carribean as shitholes?

TauntingNorth Korea rather than dealing with them in diplomatic and statesman like manner?

Referring to Mexicans as rapists?

 

He may well have done something creditable, but I don't think it has been reported in the UK.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Alteredbhoy said:

Well, as an admission that the truth doesn't matter, this is not bad, but as for his actions which of these was he right to do ...

"Grabbing women by the pussy"?

Mocking a disabled journalist?

Pulling out of the Paris Agreement?

Retweeting the the fake posts of Britain First?

Claiming Obama was not American?

Stating that Muslim Americans celebrated 9/11?

Referring to Africa and the Carribean as shitholes?

TauntingNorth Korea rather than dealing with them in diplomatic and statesman like manner?

Referring to Mexicans as rapists?

 

He may well have done something creditable, but I don't think it has been reported in the UK.

All of them. It's a free world and don't you say whatever you think. Grow up weenie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, weeniewinderupper said:

Your world I'm afraid, is one big lie. You wake on a morning telling yourself how great you are and the lie continues through your day until you go to bed still uttering the lie you woke with. Get back to Wales and try to improve your success with pigs as you haven't had much on here.

Welcome to my ignore list, tosser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Alteredbhoy said:

Well, as an admission that the truth doesn't matter, this is not bad, but as for his actions which of these was he right to do ...

"Grabbing women by the pussy"?

Mocking a disabled journalist?

Pulling out of the Paris Agreement?

Retweeting the the fake posts of Britain First?

Claiming Obama was not American?

Stating that Muslim Americans celebrated 9/11?

Referring to Africa and the Carribean as shitholes?

TauntingNorth Korea rather than dealing with them in diplomatic and statesman like manner?

Referring to Mexicans as rapists?

 

He may well have done something creditable, but I don't think it has been reported in the UK.

As I've stated before. You don't like the man's agenda, and it's impossible for you to say anything good about the man. It's not in you. I could comment on your list line by line, but you will never concede, never give in, never compromise. You haven't the capability to do so.

That's why our society is in the dire straits it is.

Edited by rowlf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, rowlf said:

As I've stated before. You don't like the man's agenda, and it's impossible for you to say anything good about the man. It's not in you. I could comment on your list line by line, but you will never concede, never give in, never compromise. You haven't the cability to do so.

Don't bother going line by line rowlf.  Just take one line, let's pick on the mocking of a disabled journalist.  Explain to me the good parts of that action?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Alteredbhoy said:

Don't bother going line by line rowlf.  Just take one line, let's pick on the mocking of a disabled journalist.  Explain to me the good parts of that action?

By God, I'll do exactly that! If he did that knowingly, then it was outrageous and incorrect...........hurtful even. After saying that, I imagine the journalist already knew he was disabled, as well as the people around him. Common knowledge. Just how sensitive is the man after being a journalist all these years? How far do we go in chastising our President for making the comment? We are talking about a man that must give orders that will cause people to die. Where the hell do you start or stop this pc bs?

Now tell me what you think about NK.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, rowlf said:

By God, I'll do exactly that! If he did that knowingly, then it was outrageous and incorrect...........hurtful even. After saying that, I imagine the journalist already knew he was disabled, as well as the people around him. Common knowledge. Just how sensitive is the man after being a journalist all these years? How far do we go in chastising our President for making the comment? We are talking about a man that must give orders that will cause people to die. Where the hell do you start or stop this pc bs?

Now tell me what you think about NK.

He hasn't the duplicity to answer any question you or I or anyone puts to him. He might be able to tell you how to tell apart a boar and a sow but I'd bet he even has to ask a countryman how to do that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, rowlf said:

If he did that knowingly, then it was outrageous and incorrect...........hurtful even. After saying that, I imagine the journalist already knew he was disabled, as well as the people around him. Common knowledge. Just how sensitive is the man after being a journalist all these years? How far do we go in chastising our President for making the comment? We are talking about a man that must give orders that will cause people to die. Where the hell do you start or stop this pc bs?

Well I'm not sure if it was done knowingly.  You decide.

Criticising him for doing this is not pc bs and claiming that it is simply makes you an apologist for appalling behaviour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Alteredbhoy said:

Well I'm not sure if it was done knowingly.  You decide.

Criticising him for doing this is not pc bs and claiming that it is simply makes you an apologist for appalling behaviour.

Nobody is apologising for anything, just the same as when you never apologise for any pig shit you try to spread around. I've told you, you cannot use a fork to do this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Alteredbhoy said:

Well I'm not sure if it was done knowingly.  You decide.

Criticising him for doing this is not pc bs and claiming that it is simply makes you an apologist for appalling behaviour.

Am I apologizing for him? Did you read what I had written? Clear the smoke from the room.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As for North Korea, Kim Jong is a despotic tyrant and needs to be dealt with.  It is unthinkable that he should be capable of launching a nuclear attack on anyone.

However, when you are dealing with a meglomaniacal madman (KJ not DT) what you cannot do is assume that he will behave in a rational way.  If you intend to prevent nuclear war by the use of Mutually Assured Destruction, then you are basing your logic upon all parties being rational and KJ quite obviously is not.  So having based your response upon his being rational you then threaten him unneceessarily with threats of nuclear retaliation and then insult him by calling him names.

How does DT expect a madman to react when threatened and abused?

Wha I also don't get about DT/NK is that DT has gone on the record as stating that he is in favour of gun ownership in the US as it allows people to defend themselves as bad guys.  This is the equivalent of MAD.  The bad guy won't attack you because you might have a gun and he will come of worst.  Using this logic, NK should be allowed nuclear weapons, as how else can they defend themselves against the US, whose President has already threatended to raze them to the ground?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, rowlf said:

Am I apologizing for him? Did you read what I had written? Clear the smoke from the room.

He can't do that. There's too much coming from his ass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, luckyme said:

He can't do that. There's too much coming from his ass.

E W-B welcome to my ignore list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Alteredbhoy said:

As for North Korea, Kim Jong is a despotic tyrant and needs to be dealt with.  It is unthinkable that he should be capable of launching a nuclear attack on anyone.

However, when you are dealing with a meglomaniacal madman (KJ not DT) what you cannot do is assume that he will behave in a rational way.  If you intend to prevent nuclear war by the use of Mutually Assured Destruction, then you are basing your logic upon all parties being rational and KJ quite obviously is not.  So having based your response upon his being rational you then threaten him unneceessarily with threats of nuclear retaliation and then insult him by calling him names.

How does DT expect a madman to react when threatened and abused?

Wha I also don't get about DT/NK is that DT has gone on the record as stating that he is in favour of gun ownership in the US as it allows people to defend themselves as bad guys.  This is the equivalent of MAD.  The bad guy won't attack you because you might have a gun and he will come of worst.  Using this logic, NK should be allowed nuclear weapons, as how else can they defend themselves against the US, whose President has already threatended to raze them to the ground?

Another immigrant for North Korea. The sooner the better and don't they breed pot bellied pigs there@ He'll be in his element.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Alteredbhoy said:

As for North Korea, Kim Jong is a despotic tyrant and needs to be dealt with.  It is unthinkable that he should be capable of launching a nuclear attack on anyone.

However, when you are dealing with a meglomaniacal madman (KJ not DT) what you cannot do is assume that he will behave in a rational way.  If you intend to prevent nuclear war by the use of Mutually Assured Destruction, then you are basing your logic upon all parties being rational and KJ quite obviously is not.  So having based your response upon his being rational you then threaten him unneceessarily with threats of nuclear retaliation and then insult him by calling him names.

How does DT expect a madman to react when threatened and abused?

Wha I also don't get about DT/NK is that DT has gone on the record as stating that he is in favour of gun ownership in the US as it allows people to defend themselves as bad guys.  This is the equivalent of MAD.  The bad guy won't attack you because you might have a gun and he will come of worst.  Using this logic, NK should be allowed nuclear weapons, as how else can they defend themselves against the US, whose President has already threatended to raze them to the ground?

One minor point. Trump didn't bring us to where we are today. It's sensational that you equate US gun ownership with NK nukes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, rowlf said:

One minor point. Trump didn't bring us to where we are today. It's sensational that you equate US gun ownership with NK nukes.

Not so much of a sensation as you may think. It's all to do with his failed breeding program, he's all mixed up and doesn't know which end is which.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, rowlf said:

Am I apologizing for him? Did you read what I had written? Clear the smoke from the room.

You need to re-read what I posted.  I never accused you of apologising for Trump.  What I said is that by claiming the criticism of him is pc bs, which you did did, makes you an apologist for his appalling behaviour.  In other words it means you condone this behaviour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now